Which is better: Yokohama or Kumho tires
Content
The Koreans also took care of the wear resistance of tires and rims: they included wide steel belts and a nylon seamless strip in the design.
Asian tires that have flooded the Russian market inspire the confidence of drivers. But which tire is better - "Yokohama" or "Kumho" - not every car owner will answer. The issue needs to be resolved, since good slopes are a guarantee of driving safety and driving comfort.
Comparison of winter tires Yokohama and Kumho
The first manufacturer has a rich history: Yokohama tires have been made for over 100 years. Kumho is a relatively young but ambitious Korean player in the global market.
It is difficult to compare which rubber is better, Yokohama or Kumho. Both companies operate on high-tech equipment using innovations and scientific achievements. The assortment is huge, but "Kumho" "shoes" not only cars of different classes, but also aircraft and special equipment. The manufacturer also made an application for the introduction of its tires for Formula 1: Pirelli has a serious competitor.
Kumho Winter tires
In the winter version, one of the Yokohama models, iceGuard Studless G075 with Velcro, proved to be excellent. Virtually silent tires behave stably on snow and ice, drivers note an instant reaction to the steering wheel. An interesting feature of Japanese stingrays is that the tread is equipped with many microbubbles that create tiny tubercles for better grip. The popularity of Yokohama winter tires is so high that Porsche, Mercedes, and other auto giants have introduced Japanese wheels as standard equipment.
At the same time, due to the strong cord, the wear resistance of the product is very high.
When deciding which winter tires are better - Yokohama or Kumho - a Korean manufacturer should be preferred. Japanese rubber does not give drivers the confidence to control on ice.
Comparison of summer tires "Yokohama" and "Kumho"
For other seasonal products, the situation is changing. But not the exact opposite. So, hydroplaning resistance - the main "summer" quality - is at the same level for both manufacturers.
Tires "Kumho" are designed very reliably. The protector is cut by four longitudinal rings: two central and the same number of outer ones. On the latter, there are many lamellas for additional moisture removal. On wet and dry pavement tires demonstrate the same stable behavior in any driving style.
Summer tires Yokohama
The Koreans also took care of the wear resistance of tires and rims: they included wide steel belts and a nylon seamless strip in the design.
Even with extreme, sporty driving style. The contact area of the wheel with the road and the number of slots are precisely adjusted, which gives confidence at high speeds. The seasonal assortment of the Japanese is wider.
Buyers often decide which summer tires are better, Yokohama or Kumho, in favor of the Koreans.
Economical and user-friendly Yokohama and Kumho
In relation to two specific manufacturers, the question of superiority is rather incorrect: the authority of both firms is too high.
However, the young Korean company seems more promising. And that's why. The price tag of the Kumho is lower, and the durability is higher, which is crucial for many drivers.
In ratings, reviews, tests, Koreans gain more points. But the gap is so small that it can be attributed to the subjective opinion of users. Having bought Japanese tires, you will not be disappointed, but on Korean slopes you will feel peace of mind for the behavior of the car on the road of any complexity, the safety of your crew.
