The interiors of these cars did not meet the standards
Interesting articles

The interiors of these cars did not meet the standards

Every year, automakers are investing more and more effort into the aesthetics of cars. Most modern cars today have amazing interiors filled with detailed materials, high technology and exotic features. However, from time to time we tend to stumble upon specific details that spoil the entire interior.

Today, it is extremely important for automakers to remember that the interior of a car is as important as its appearance. It's really pointless to focus on looks and lose sight of the fact that while you're on the road, you'll be spending most of your time inside the car, not outside. These are the worst car showrooms we have ever seen!

Keep reading to find out why the Chevy Camaro made this list!

1996 Mercedes-Benz F200 (imagination)

The Mercedes F-Series has unveiled some amazing concept cars, but the F200 Imagination had one of the weirdest and coolest interiors of all. The most important thing you'll notice about the car is that it didn't have pedals or a steering wheel. Instead, joysticks are installed in the middle of the console and door to control the vehicle.

The interiors of these cars did not meet the standards

In addition to the tachometer and speedometer, the car is also equipped with rear view cameras to the right and left of the display. The center console has the most impractical layout and looks a little odd, mostly due to the fact that it is shaped like a sphere.

2008 Citron Hypnos

Citroën Hypnos is a premium mid-size SUV. This car has the most unusual and colorful interior of all time with blue-purple rear seats, bright red dashboard and orange-green-yellow front seats. The structure of the seats is also rather odd, with slats along the base and triangles forming the surface of the seat.

The interiors of these cars did not meet the standards

Another weird thing about this car is that the headrests hang from the ceiling. Not only that, from the steering wheel, gear shifting to the pedals - there is nothing normal in this car.

1998 Fiat Multipla

The Fiat Multipla is considered one of the ugliest cars of all time. Produced from 1998 to 2010 by the Italian automaker Fiat. It had three seating configurations in a row, which allowed the rear seats to be moved and removed, as well as the adjustment of the front seats, making the car very practical. However, the headlights with bulging eyes and the bulge at the bottom of the A-pillars made the car look like an irradiated tadpole. In addition, it had a bulky glass cockpit at the back, and some strange object protruding from the front.

The interiors of these cars did not meet the standards

The second generation Multipla was redesigned and put into production in 2004. Fiat has smoothed out the odd shape of the hood, bumper and windshield, but no changes have been made to the rear of the car.

BMW 7 SERIES E 65

The name BMW conveys a sense of class and elegance - it's a James Bond car, after all. Everything about the E65 is exquisite except for the interior, which had a major problem. This car has gone from a simple yet elegant to an ugly and sophisticated luxury barge.

The interiors of these cars did not meet the standards

The BMW E 65 Series was the first car to feature iDrive, which was heavily criticized around the world. Luckily, BMW fixed this problem in a few years. But the E 65 series will never be fondly remembered. All in all, it's a real shame that BMW has climbed to the top spot with this car on the list.

Fiat 500

When it comes to interiors, the Fiat 500 lags behind. To begin with, the car does not have a trunk release button, so you will have to use a key fob to open the hatchback. Also, the key fob button will only work when you remove the key from the ignition.

The interiors of these cars did not meet the standards

This subcompact also lacks an interior door lock button, making it more of a nuisance. If you want to open the door, you will have to open it with the handle. And to unlock the passenger side door, you'll need to reach out and open it. Those are good reasons not to buy this car.

Another unfortunate Chevrolet ahead!

1985 Renault 5

Let's go back to the time when Renault was released in 1985. This subcompact car was expertly packaged and became wildly popular in no time. Since the start of production 24 years ago, 5.5 million units have been sold. The car's interior was quirky, with uniquely French and visceral features.

The interiors of these cars did not meet the standards

The most distinguishing feature of the interior was a pocket on the passenger side that gave access to maps, guidebooks or other small items. The interior of the 1985 Renault 5 was available in a variety of colors and with a wide variety of upholstery. It was available in soft beige, dark black and bright red.

The whole truth about the Chevy Camaro - next!

Chevrolet Camaro (5th generation)

In the cabin of the fifth-generation Camaro, plastic is heavy and cheap. But what makes the car even more terrible is its poor visibility. According to Chevrolet, they were trying to make the car safe and masculine, so they ended up shrinking the windows down to letterboxes.

The interiors of these cars did not meet the standards

The Camaro has always been described as an American muscle car due to its unique design and distinctive rumble, but Chevrolet's odd interior choice has diminished its value. While the exterior of the car is all about masculinity, the interior is in need of a major update.

2006 Cadillac XLR

The Cadillac XLR was introduced in 2006 and is popular for its attractive design, standard features, comfortable hardtop and forgiving ride quality. However, looking at the exterior, the car's interior deserves much better and more classic styling. There's so much gray inside the car that it's easy to mistake it for rough sheet metal.

The interiors of these cars did not meet the standards

In addition, the interior does not match the price and is not as sporty as other models. In addition, it has very little cargo space, which can be uncomfortable for tall drivers.

TVR Sagaris

Sagaris is one of Britain's most famous sports cars. It has a lot of features to offer, but unfortunately its interior is one of the worst. The interior of the car looks tiring, and the color of the interior does not match the actual color of the car at all.

The interiors of these cars did not meet the standards

It seems the car manufacturer didn't have the budget to make an outstanding cabin. It also explains details such as why the button to open the car door was located next to the stereo. It doesn't make any sense. The only thing that sets the TVR Sagaris apart from the competition is its sporty and stylish design; everything else is a complete failure.

1983 Citroen GSA

1983 Citroën GSA has the strangest car interior ever. This car was odd in many ways - it had a fastback style and a sleek body, the car's rear wheels were semi-covered for better aerodynamic efficiency. In addition, the car's hydropneumatic suspension allowed it to ride on the road with more stability than its competitors.

The interiors of these cars did not meet the standards

The interior design of the Citroën GSA was inspired by fighter jets, making it difficult to understand the controls of the car. Its parts scattered randomly anywhere; for example, the radio was placed in the center console and the speedometer looked like a drum that showed the speed in a tiny viewing window.

James Bond wouldn't be happy if we included this next car!

1976 Aston Martin Lagonda Series 2

No other car interior looked as strange as the Aston Martin Lagonda. The interior of this car made no sense in terms of design and was a dubious aesthetic choice. However, the Martin Lagonda was quite ambitious in its day - it had touch buttons for lighting, air conditioning, power locks and seat controls, and it was the first car to feature a digital control panel with LED displays.

The interiors of these cars did not meet the standards

In the 1970s, the electronic system of a car was considered complex by many. For this reason, only 645 Aston Martin Lagondas were produced from 1974 to 1990.

Honda Civic (9th generation)

If you think that more buttons are annoying, then you are wrong. More screens can also be annoying. When Honda introduced the 9th generation Civic, it took a step in the wrong direction with its stuffed interior. There were so many digital screens in this car that one might have thought it was a broadcasting station. It also had two screens on the driver's right side and one for the infotainment system.

The interiors of these cars did not meet the standards

If you're wondering what a compact interior looks like, then you should take a look at the Mazda 3's interior, which features a head-up display (HUD), a navigation screen placed in the right place, and a simple instrument cluster.

Dodge avenger

The Dodge Avenger was the worst interior car of the mid-2000s. Looking at the shabby interior, you probably never want to get into a car. While the manufacturers tried their best to add some gimmicks to the car and make it completely modern, they failed badly and the car ended up looking more boring with its gray interior.

The interiors of these cars did not meet the standards

Also the materials used in the car were made of cheap plastic. Nobody should think about buying this car, especially if you are looking for an attractive and comfortable ride.

Chevrolet Cavalier

You must have noticed by now that General Motors has a reputation for making unappealing interiors, and the Chevrolet Cavalier is no exception. First of all, there are too many heating, ventilation and air conditioning buttons inside, which is confusing. Also, the unusual design of the car makes it difficult to adjust the heat or place a drink in the cup holder.

The interiors of these cars did not meet the standards

Also, GM did an exceptional job of adding glowing gauges, but green definitely wasn't a good idea. There are also no comfortable seats in the car, which makes driving extremely unpleasant.

Ford Focus ST

Focus ST - not the best creation of Ford. It has a poor quality interior with too many buttons on the dashboard. These buttons in the car greatly complicate the control process. In addition, despite the sufficient space inside the car, it causes claustrophobia.

The interiors of these cars did not meet the standards

The button-laden design of the car is by far the worst. However, over the years of production, both the quality and technology of the Ford ST have taken a big step forward. Since then, it has undergone several cosmetic changes, and today the interior looks much more attractive.

Toyota Corolla 1990s

Toyota is a small car manufactured by Toyota. The 90s Toyota Corolla was poorly designed, especially the interior. It has very little headroom, making it difficult to get in and out of the car.

The interiors of these cars did not meet the standards

The Corolla is pretty neat and simple when it comes to driving. However, its size doesn't make the cut. So, if you are planning a long trip with your athlete friend, you should be prepared for the inconvenience it will create.

Toyota Prius

Once you see the Toyota Prius from the inside, you will find that almost everything is wrong inside. First, you'll notice the gear shifter, which isn't great. And then if you try to reverse the car, it will beep you like an eighteen-wheeler. Worst of all, hardly anyone can hear the beep from outside.

The interiors of these cars did not meet the standards

Finally, the plastic used in the car is terrible. If you decide to speed up, it will make a loud sound that will remind you of the noise you probably heard at the zoo.

Toyota Yaris

You make the first impression of a car by looking at its exterior, but its interior is what decides or breaks the deal. Undoubtedly, Toyota Yaris is a budget car, which may be the reason why it does not have a very beautiful interior.

The interiors of these cars did not meet the standards

Like other budget cars, the interior of the Yaris is made from cheap materials, including the door and dashboard. But what makes the interior worse is the placement of the speedometer - right in the middle of the console. In addition, it lacks a visual entertainment system, which makes the car feel more dreary from the inside.

Next, Volkswagen joins the "fun"!

Old Volkswagen Passat

If you buy an old version of the VW Passat, you will definitely not like the gear change. However, if you drive this car on the highway, you will notice that it is surprisingly fast.

The interiors of these cars did not meet the standards

The mechanism is located in such a way that makes it very uncomfortable for the driver. This is very frustrating. Previous versions of the Passat also had a seating system with bolsters that acted as a barrier, especially when shifting hard. Apart from this issue, everything in the cabin was decent enough.

Jaguar XFR-S

It's a misconception that all luxury cars have good interiors. The Jaguar XFR-S falls into the category of luxury cars with a downright annoying interior.

The interiors of these cars did not meet the standards

This car is filled with chrome parts inside. It looks stylish, but when the sun hits at a certain angle, there are glare from the surface that can blind you while driving. This is certainly not ideal for a supercar with 550 hp of braking power.

Skoda Octavia VRS

Skoda is widely known for producing heavy and durable cars that have stood the test of time - the Octavia VRS is one of them. This car offers a smooth ride, but the interior has one major flaw that makes it a big flop - it's made up of fake carbon fiber trim.

The interiors of these cars did not meet the standards

At one time, carbon fiber was used to hide unsightly looking walkways. It is currently used to improve the appearance of cars. Honestly, it looks cheap and makes the car less attractive.

Mercedes S Class

Without a doubt, the Mercedes C Class is one of the luxury vehicles with exceptional performance. However, the interior of the car is not up to par as it is fitted with piano black plastic. It's hard to know what the German manufacturer was thinking when using a horribly nasty and cheap material for a high-end luxury car.

The interiors of these cars did not meet the standards

The Mercedes C Class has a lot of this stuff on the center console. This one big mistake ruined the entire interior of this gorgeous car.

Buick Reatta

It's no surprise that Buick made it onto this list of vehicles with unappealing interiors. First, let's applaud GM's efforts to introduce the touch screen in the 1980s for HVAC and radio control. However, the Buick Reatta was a big flop because its touchscreen barely worked and it was widely criticized around the world.

The interiors of these cars did not meet the standards

The vehicle manufacturer was clearly trying to be futuristic, but the fact remains that the design was way ahead of its time.

Pontiac Grand Prix (5th generation)

If you are in the category of people who like buttons, then you should go to the Pontiac Grand Prix. In the 1990s, this car was a major twist because it had buttons for just about everything.

The interiors of these cars did not meet the standards

It had four buttons for the wipers and then another set of four buttons for the lights only. It also had several buttons on the steering wheel, each for a different reason. In addition, there was nothing attractive about the radio - it was insipid and boring!

2010 Subaru Outback

As for the interior, Subaru Outback is not the best choice. It is flooded with plastic (brushed metal fake), feels flimsy and looks dull. We all know that Subaru's are notorious for being a bit spartan and rugged, but given the price, this is a pretty big disappointment.

The interiors of these cars did not meet the standards

One of the biggest downsides of this car is the shift lever, which is covered in frayed plastic and looks cheap. And then, to add to that, the padded interchangeable boot is not at all attractive. Overall, the Subaru, with its CVT, looks like a radio-controlled toy car.

2001 Pontiac Axtec

The Pontiac Aztek was introduced back in the 2000s and has always been at the top of the overall "Worst Cars Ever Made" list. Not only did he have an ugly appearance, but his interior was extremely unattractive.

The interiors of these cars did not meet the standards

Everything inside the car feels fragile, including the temperature controls, which appear to be hollow. Also, if you hit a pothole by mistake, you'll hear a shiny black plastic creak that's extremely annoying. In general, this car is full of flaws.

1979 AMC Pacer

It's not surprising to see cars with ugly interiors and exteriors - the Pacer also falls into those categories. It was built by American automaker AMS and looked like an inverted aquarium on wheels.

The interiors of these cars did not meet the standards

Inside the car, you'll find loads of shiny brown vinyl, awkward-looking steering, and dull wood veneer slabs. Not only that, the square-shaped instrument was carelessly inserted into a dark space on the dashboard, making it almost unreadable. In addition, air conditioning and radio control were simply placed anywhere.

Nissan Quest 2004

The 2004 Nissan Quest was a full-size minivan with three rows of seats. The car had an unusual interior with a torpedo on a support post, similar to the decapitated R2-D2.

The interiors of these cars did not meet the standards

In addition, the black and red trim did not look good and was uncomfortable. In addition, the speedometer was placed right in front of the passenger seat, which makes no sense. Overall, when it comes to interior quality, this car was a total disappointment and didn't live up to its purpose.

2011 Nissan Cube

The Nissan Cube had strange design details, both outside and inside. On the outside, it featured an asymmetrical rear end, oblong windows, taillights located just above the rear bumper, and an upright cubic shape that spoiled the overall look of the car.

The interiors of these cars did not meet the standards

It's hard to know what the Japanese automaker was thinking when designing this car. The interior was as whimsical as the exterior, with an unconventional color scheme and compact space. Also, you couldn't help but notice the pile of shaggy carpeting in the center of the dashboard. This car was a complete nightmare.

1997 Ford Aspire

The 1997 Ford Aspire has a strange interior with blue plastic on the dashboard. It also had a regular steering wheel without any details or seams. In addition, the low glove box and ribbed leather trunk gave the cabin a gaudy feel.

The interiors of these cars did not meet the standards

Overall, the 1997 Ford Aspire was a reliable and affordable car, but other cars offered much better interiors and power. You can see how the automaker cut costs to keep the consumer price so low!

1992 Buick Skylark

The Buick Skylark is a car that a great-grandmother would drive. Slippery vinyl door panels, hard red velvet seats and shiny wood panels make the car a complete disaster. There is nothing visually pleasing inside the car, not even the steering wheel.

The interiors of these cars did not meet the standards

In addition, the gaudy wood veneer looks cheap and gives the car a dull look. Buick was known for its old-school charm, but with the advent of the Skylark it has lost all of its elegance.

1983 Nissan NRV-II

At first glance, it may seem that there is nothing strange about the Nissan NRV-II. It has everything you can get in a modern car, including a cluster of digital gauges, sat-nav in the center console, and a multi-function steering wheel.

The interiors of these cars did not meet the standards

However, one thing you have to remember about this car is that it belongs to the 1980s. So, too many functions with randomly located buttons made it difficult for drivers to learn how to drive. Also, the most confusing thing about this car was the volume up button, which was as big as the engine start button.

1982 Lancia Orca

The Lancia Orca is an aerodynamic sedan that looks cool on the outside but is a mess on the inside. It features an impractical and extremely complex cluster of digital gauges with glowing bars that display RPM (revolutions per minute) and speed. In addition, his steering wheel had many buttons for air conditioning, lighting, wipers and turn signals, making it difficult to learn how to drive a car.

The interiors of these cars did not meet the standards

To the left of the group of sensors you will find what shows the transmission you are in and on the right side you will see the Sony radio unit. Of course, this car has the most bulky interior.

2008 Renault Ondelios

Renault Ondelios is a French car produced in the 2000s. It has a strange external structure, and inside the car is even crazier. The transparent dashboard of the car protrudes outward and is located directly behind the steering wheel, which also looks strange.

The interiors of these cars did not meet the standards

It also has a projector that displays satellite navigation information on the dashboard. The most unusual thing about this car is the keypad, which is used to control the vital functions of the car. This is a highly impractical feature for everyday use.

1971 Maserati Boomerang

The Maserati Boomerang was released in 1971. This car is not all that unusual on the outside as wedge-shaped cars were popular in the 1970s. What sets the car apart from the competition is the interior.

The interiors of these cars did not meet the standards

The car's steering wheel is vertical and revolves around a seven-sensor instrument cluster, including a series of warning lights and several buttons. All in all, the Maserati Boomerang was a very functional concept car, but the people who drove it knew it wasn't very practical.

2004 Acura EL

The 2004 Acura EL was known for its affordability, speed, and comfort. However, the worst part of this car was its interior, which was pathetically styled. It was boring and offered little.

The interiors of these cars did not meet the standards

The materials used inside the car were subpar, lacking panache and flair compared to other competing luxury sedans. Overall, the Acura EL is functional, but the interior isn't very luxurious.

Chevrolet Impala 2005 year

As one of the few six-seat cars on the market, the Chevrolet Impala is known for its efficient and reliable V6 engines, standard safety features and more. However, when it comes to the interior, it has a bland design and uses cheap plastic.

The interiors of these cars did not meet the standards

In addition, it has fuzzy steering and raw suspension on LS and base models. Compared to its Chrysler and Toyota rivals, the Impala doesn't have much to offer. Even the SS version of the car hasn't had any styling changes other than a few "SS" logos and a new set of gauges. Overall, the 2005 Chevrolet Impala has an inexpensive interior.

2002 KIA Sportage

The KIA Sportage is an affordable car with a high degree of enjoyment and lotus-tuned suspension. From the name "Sportage" we expect a sharp and sporty look. However, this car offers nothing of the sort. KIA's main motive was to produce inexpensive cars with the look and feel of an expensive car, but it failed.

The interiors of these cars did not meet the standards

The Sportage's cabin is made from cheap materials and has limited rear seat space, which makes it extremely uncomfortable to sit in the car, especially during long trips.

1999 Ford Contour

Most Ford Contour owners feel they did a great job with the placement of the controls and buttons in the car. To be honest, apart from the buttons and controls, everything in the car looks flat. The manual thermostat gauges leave a lot to be desired, and there's too much plastic on the dash.

The interiors of these cars did not meet the standards

Cup holders installed in the car are not capable of holding drinks, especially while driving. In addition, the radio is located directly above the cup holder, which means that you can’t put anything too large in it. In addition, the seats are unattractive and plain in every way.

Mini Cooper 1994

Earlier Mini Cooper models had several internal problems, especially the 1994 version. There was too much of everything - a red carpet, a disgusting steering wheel, a beige and red door - not a good idea at all. The designers tried to make it cute and retro, but ended up making it a disaster. In addition, the placement of the speedometer in the center proved to be a big drawback.

The interiors of these cars did not meet the standards

Over the years of production, the Mini Cooper has corrected all its internal problems. Today, the Mini Cooper is one of the best cars and one of the most enjoyable cars to drive.

Add a comment