Comparison of tires "Marshal", "Kumho" and "Pirelli". Which tire is better
Content
Grip properties and handling when driving on icy road surfaces are somewhat lower than those of competitors, because tires should be bought by car owners who operate cars in driving conditions on snowy roads, and not on cleared city streets.
Better tires "Marshal" or "Kumho", or is it worth choosing Pirelli - questions that motorists often ask. Tire selection should begin with reviewing reviews from other owners and reviewing test results.
Which tires are better - Kumho or MARSHAL
The Kumho company appeared in South Korea in the mid-sixties. It took a couple of decades for production volumes to be comparable with the activity of world leaders. "Marshal" is a trademark from England that originated in the seventies. Despite the independence of the brand, production belongs to the Korean Kumho Tires.
To figure out if the models of tires produced under different names differ, to decide whether Marshal or Kumho tires are better, you need to refer to the test results.
Winter tires (studded, Velcro)
The cold season tires from the Kumho and MARSHAL brands are almost identical. The kits are distinguished by balanced characteristics, they show the same reliability on asphalt or on snow.
Grip properties and handling when driving on icy road surfaces are somewhat lower than those of competitors, because tires should be bought by car owners who operate cars in driving conditions on snowy roads, and not on cleared city streets.
Summer tires
Similar results show a comparison of tires designed for operation in the hot season. Models showcased:
- equal indicators for wear resistance - they are enough for 34-500 km of run;
- good directional stability on dry and wet asphalt;
- excellent handling;
- average noise levels.
Since the production is carried out on the same lines and the composition of the rubber compound, the tread pattern, the cord features of the tires are similar, which is better - Marshal or Kumho tires - each car owner decides personally, based on his own ideas. You need to select a kit, taking into account the subtleties of the behavior of tires and taking into account the characteristics of the roads on which you will have to travel in winter or summer.
Comparison of Kumho and Pirelli tires
The South Korean concern seeks to bypass competitors from other countries. Pirelli is the world's fifth largest tire manufacturer, whose reputation is supported by numerous positive reviews.
To decide whether Kumho or Pirelli tires are better, it is worth taking into account the opinions of experts and test results.
Adhesion to the surface
Summer kits from both manufacturers show similar characteristics in terms of adhesion to asphalt both in rain and fine days. The table will help you compare the Kumho and Pirelli tires prepared for the winter period.
Kumho | Pirelli |
Winter tires | |
Stable handling | Best performance in handling |
Satisfactory grip on asphalt | Reliable acceleration on icy or snowy roads |
Low grip on ice | High course stability |
Weak acceleration on snow | Stable set of speed |
It is difficult to maneuver, directional stability is lost in conditions of snow drifts | Slightly loses in controllability with active driving |
Limited patency | Confidently moves even on the track with deep snow drifts |
Low level of comfort, noise | Noisy, but provides a relative smooth ride |
Budget price category | Premium class |
Maneuverability
Pirelli tires outperform the South Korean brand in terms of handling, directional stability and maneuverability, and show the best performance among many competitive models. They provide great fuel economy, and the treads are designed to significantly reduce the risk of aquaplaning.
The only drawback of the Italian brand is the high cost. Kumho are budget tires that are suitable for drivers for everyday, rather than extreme driving, for traveling on reliable tracks where patency is not so significant.
Feedback from drivers and specialists
Which tires are better - Kumho or Pirelli, whether it is worth buying the products of the Marshall subsidiary brand, reviews from car owners who have already installed certain tires also help to decide.
The Korean company says the following about summer tires:
High wear resistance and good handling are positive aspects for budget rubber.
All-season models withstand several years of operation and provide driving comfort.
Among winter tires, Pirelli products more often receive positive user comments. They note elasticity, excellent adhesion, patency even in deep snow.
Rubber for the cold season from "Marshall" also receives good reviews. However, it performs well in urban conditions, where the roads are cleared.