Which tires are better - Bridgestone or Yokohama: performance comparison, review, opinions
Content
To find out which tires are better, "Bridgestone" or "Yokohama", the experts conducted a test of braking speed. Cars accelerated to 100 km / h and stopped abruptly. On dry pavement, the Bridge braked after 35,5 m, and the competitor after 37,78 m. The residual speed of the Bluearth was higher - 26,98 km / h versus 11,5 km / h.
To find out which tires are better, "Bridgestone" or "Yokohama", the experts conducted a series of tests. We compared the technical characteristics of tires, the noise level and the ride quality on winter and summer roads.
Main evaluation criteria
As part of the testing, experts examined the following indicators:
- Handling in different conditions.
- Deceleration speed.
- Hydroplaning resistance. At this stage, the experts found out which tires, Bridgestone or Yokohama, hold better grip on wet roads.
These factors determine driving comfort and safety.
Comparison of tires "Yokohama" and "Bridgestone"
For testing winter tires, experts used IceGuard iG60 and Blizzak Ice with an asymmetric tread pattern. Turanza T001 and Bluearth RV-02 participated in summer trials.
Winter tires
Comparison of Yokohama and Bridgestone winter studless tires was carried out in different conditions: on wet, snowy and icy roads.
Handling test results:
- On ice. IceGuard tires overtook the rival - 8 vs. 7 on a 10-point scale.
- On a snowy track. Tires IceGuard scored 9 points, and Blizzak Ice only 7.
- On wet pavement. Both opponents were equally stable - on a solid 7.
Bridgestone tires
To figure out which winter tires are better in terms of traction - Yokohama or Bridgestone - the experts tested the tires in acceleration and braking:
- On ice. The results were the same - 6 points out of 10.
- On a snowy track. IceGuard scored 9 and Blizzak Ice scored 8.
- In the snowdrifts. Bridgestone stalled and got a rating of 5. In the Russian Winter mode, this rubber is practically useless. And Yokohama deserved 10 points.
- On wet pavement. Rubber "Bridge" showed itself well during acceleration and braking: car owners gave it 10 points. The opponent only got 6.
- On a dry track. The gap has leveled off: IceGuard and Blizzak Ice have 9 each.
Summer tires
With longitudinal hydroplaning, one of the wheels of the car breaks away from the highway, driving the car into a skid. Transverse is even more dangerous - two wheels lose traction.
Wet test results:
- Longitudinal aquaplaning. With Turanza tires, the car goes into a skid at a speed of 77 km / h, with competitor tires - at 73,9 km / h.
- Transverse aquaplaning. Result: Turanza - 3,45 km/h, Bluearth - 2,85 km/h.
- Side skid. The stability of the "Bridge" was 7,67 m / s2 against 7,55 m/s2 in a competitor.
Yokohama tires
To find out which tires are better, "Bridgestone" or "Yokohama", the experts conducted a test of braking speed. Cars accelerated to 100 km / h and stopped abruptly. On dry pavement, the Bridge braked after 35,5 m, and the competitor after 37,78 m. The residual speed of Bluearth was higher - 26,98 km / h versus 11,5 km / h.
Which tires are better according to owners
Car owners find it difficult to answer which tires are better - Bridgestone or Yokohama. Both opponents scored 4,2 points out of 5.
Comparing competitors, buyers took into account:
- wear rate;
- noise level;
- controllability.
Voting results are shown in the comparative table.
| Yokohama | Bridgestone | |
| Durability | 4,1 | 4,2 |
| Noise | 4,1 | 3,8 |
| Controllability | 4,1 | 4,3 |
When deciding which is better, Bridgestone or Yokohama tires, car owners often choose the first option. The sales volume of this manufacturer is higher than that of a competitor.
