Choosing the best winter tires: the pros and cons of Kumho and Hankook, winter tire comparison
Content
The indicator depends on the tread pattern - deep grooves and directional lines push water out better. If we compare winter tires "Hankuk" and "Kumho", then this parameter is higher for the second rubber. Wheels "shod in Kumho" are more stable on wet roads and in slushy weather. On tires Hankook the car skids a little on corners. But experienced drivers can handle it.
Kumho and Hankook are Korean tire manufacturers that are very popular among car enthusiasts. The characteristics of the tires are very similar. But in some performance indicators, the products of these brands differ. Let's compare which winter tires are better: Kumho or Hankuk.
Winter tires "Kumho" or "Hankuk" - how to choose
When choosing tires, you should pay attention to the following factors: material quality, tread pattern, rubber wear resistance, ability to move in various road and weather conditions, as well as cost.
Winter tires "Kumho": pros and cons
To determine which winter tires are better, Hankook or Kumho, you need to separately consider all the qualities of both models.
Kumho winter tires have the following advantages:
- good handling, excellent "hold the road" in the corners;
- high comfort - no noise, softness of movement;
- reasonable cost, in comparison with other brands with the same characteristics;
- versatility - rubber behaves well on snowy roads, during periods of slush.
Kumho tires
Cons:
- high fuel consumption due to high rolling resistance;
- heavy tire weight, which negatively affects acceleration dynamics;
- poor grip on icy roads.
Hankook winter tires: pros and cons
Hankook tires are made from quality materials by a Korean manufacturer and have proven themselves among owners of various cars.
Pros:
- comfort - low noise while driving, including on wet and icy road sections;
- increased wear resistance - rubber is enough for several seasons, the spikes do not wear out and do not fall off;
- good combination of "price-quality".
Hankook tires
Cons of the Hankook product:
- if stored improperly, the rubber will dry out and crack;
- poor handling on slushy and wet roads;
- vibration at high speed;
- the quality of the spikes is small, they do not cope well with heavily snowy roads.
Final comparison
To find out which winter tires are better, Kumho or Hanukkah, let's compare them in terms of important performance parameters:
- Hydroplaning resistance. The indicator depends on the tread pattern - deep grooves and directional lines push water out better. If we compare winter tires "Hankuk" and "Kumho", then this parameter is higher for the second rubber. Wheels "shod in Kumho" are more stable on wet roads and in slushy weather. On tires Hankook the car skids a little on corners. But experienced drivers can handle it.
- Noise level. Hankook winter tires, according to reviews and tests, are better than Kumho in this criterion. Kumho are more "loud".
- Wear resistance. "Kumho" is slightly, but still inferior to "Hankook" in terms of the quality of the material.
Hankook tires are more expensive. But drivers believe that such a price is justified.
"Kumho" or "Hankuk": which Korean winter tires are better, depends on the personal preferences of motorists. Both variants have many fans. Products cope with the stated requirements and are suitable for movement in winter off-road conditions. To find out which rubber is better, "Kumho" or "Hankuk", you need to gain experience in operating both models. There are no significant differences between them.
